Genos2: ¿Si o No?

A bit tardy with my first take on Genos2. I’ve spent waaay too much time on forums and need to get back to work. 🙂

Genos2 information and videos abound on the Web, so I’ll be skipping a lot of details here. I recommend getting your information from reputable sources, not the self-appointed experts on Internet forums. Given the misinformation that I’ve seen, I don’t think some of these people have ever touched an arranger keyboard, let alone Genos1 or Genos2.

It will be some time until I can actually get hands-on with Genos2. That’s a disadvantage of living in North America where guitar is king. When I do play Genos2, I will post comments. So, please take my initial opinions with a grain of salt.

Genos2 leaves me feeling a bit like Dr. Jekyll and a little bit Mr. Hyde, depending upon Genos2 being your first top-of-the-line (TOTL) arranger or an upgrade from Genos1.

Let’s hear from the kindly doctor first.

Your first TOTL

If Genos2 is your first TOTL arranger, you’re on good ground. Genos2 builds on the solid Genos1 foundation. Genos1 has been a reliable, great sounding instrument and I’m sure you won’t be disappointed in G2.

Genos2 adds many new voices and styles to Genos1. (Some of the Genos1 voices and styles are available with the Genos2 Complete Pack, free after registration.) I made a list of the new Genos2 voices.

Genos2 significantly improves on the G1 CFX piano. It has more strike (velocity) levels, now 7 levels up from 5. The sustain is longer (doubled). Check out this video which focuses on Genos2 pianos. The G2 piano sounds are lovely.

Like the Montage upgrade, G2 received “character pianos“:

  • Character piano: A rough and wooly sound (think “ragtime”)
  • Cinematic piano: An air of mystery about it (think “Halloween”)
  • Felt piano: A sound softened by felt woven in the strings (think “Titanic”)

Unlike Montage M, all of these pianos are enriched by the stunning, new REVelation reverb from Steinberg. Genos2 also adds a new multi-band compressor.

Genos2 adds Ambient Drums to the original Genos1 Revo drums. (Ignore the Internet misinformation about Revo being dropped.) Ambient Drums mix close-mic’ed samples with room ambience samples consistent with sampling techniques employed in modern percussion VST libraries. You (or the style) dial in the amount of ambience, thereby adjusting the sense of space in the sound.

One shouldn’t forget the new true FM voices. Yamaha enabled the FM-X hardware in the Genos2 tone generators. [BTW, the FM hardware is locked away in Genos1.] Now you get real dynamic FM sound. Genos2 does not support FM voice editing, but, really, how people are going to create FM voices from scratch? Not to mention how notoriously hard it is to get one’s mind around FM programming. A free DX7 expansion pack awaits those who register. With a little deep diving, I can safely say there is real FM-X in there.

No doubt, Yamaha have produced new styles and revamped old styles to use the new effects and voices. There are now 800 styles, which in itself, is a staggering big MIDI phrase library.

Ambient Drums illustrate the Genos ethos — producing a refined, “like the recording” sound. I’m sure this gives hobby players a lot of pride and pleasure. I like it because I can produce great sounding demos without a lot of effort!

Genos2 includes other enhancements worth mentioning. The style Dynamics Control improves on G1 dynamic control. The new Dynamics Control provides knob control over the volume and velocity of style parts, letting the backing band more realistically sit out or dig in. The front panel adds two more assignable buttons (3 total above the articulation buttons) and two buttons to control the ever-useful Chord Looper.

If you don’t own a Genos and want one, buy it. Given Yamaha’s long development cycles, it may be five or six years before the next major Genos release.

Upgrade to Genos2?

The decision to upgrade from the previous model is always a difficult one, whether its Montage M, MODX+, Genos2, Korg, Roland, whatever. There might be a few of us who are made of money, but most of us punters need to lay off old gear in order to afford the new. If it’s a trade-in or a re-sell, we’re going to lose value and we’re going to pony up cash for the shiny new object. In the case of a premium product like Genos2 or Montage M, the delta might be $1,800 or more. And then there’s the hassle of dealing with the villains on Craigslist or Ray’s Music Exchange.

This is when and where Mr. Hyde makes an entrance.

The decision to upgrade is a personal decision and choice. Objectively, does the delta enable us to meet our personal musical goals, that is, fulfill a genuine need? Otherwise, I cannot objectively account for enthusiasm, fan-dom, FOMO, or just plain desire (G.A.S.).

Which leads me to…

Generation skipping

When it comes to electronics, I’m a “generation skipper.” I rarely buy the next generation of anything. I don’t find the value proposition — increased utility per upgrade dollars — to be enough to justify a purchase.

So it is with Genos2. My Genos1 is still a rockin’ keyboard. It isn’t used up in the economic sense.

By the way, now is a terrific time to buy a new old stock (NOS) or re-sale Genos1. North American retailers have not sold through and are selling NOS Genos1 at a reduced price. [I took my own advice and have made a deal for an NOS Clavinova CSP-170.] European customers are switching to Genos2 in droves and they need to unload their Genos1 keyboards in order to fund a new G2. Buy a reduced price Genos1 now and upgrade to a Genos3 later. Many different ways to make a play.

Need over want

What would it have taken to make me decide otherwise and buy Genos2? Or, letting Mr. Hyde loose, what is Genos2 missing?

Right now, my most pressing need is an 88-key piano action keyboard for practice. I need to raise my piano skills and I need to transition to an acoustic grand when necessary. The FSX action is not up to snuff — I’ve tried with Genos1.

Compared to Clavinova (for example), Genos2 is missing:

Even Montage M8X left me up short.

What really disappointed me is the other biggee — no Virtual Circuit Modeling (VCM) rotary organ simulator. This is a big omission as far as upgrade is concerned. With two really fine synth-action instruments (Genos1 and MODX) in hand, I just can’t justify an upgrade to G2 based on what G2 is and isn’t today.

Yamaha product silos

Looking at Montage M and Genos2, Yamaha’s product silos get in the way of making all-rounder keyboards. Yamaha product groups protect their turf and abhor cannibalized sales. This attitude and market strategy drives a lot of customers crazy, including me.

Reading the forums, there is demand for an 88-key Genos. The P-S500 is not enough to scratch the arranger itch, DGX-670 is feature-light and CVP prices are way out of sight.

Yamaha need to pick up the pace and roll out new features faster. Will Genos2 people need to wait five years to get the VCM rotary sim, Bösendorfer piano, or VRM? At age 72, I’ve got about 11 years left (male, life expectancy, U.S.A.) Let’s get going, Yamaha! 🙂 My time is running out…

Copyright © 2023 Paul J. Drongowski

Genos 2 is here

Key features:

  • Steinberg’s REVelation reverb
  • Over 1900 voices
  • Over 800 styles
  • Style dynamics control
  • Ambient drums
  • FM synthesis
  • Three assignable buttons (above the 3 articulation buttons)
  • Updated playlist features and interface
  • Bluetooth audio
  • Support by Rec’N’Share app
  • HDMI port
  • Front panel buttons for Chord Looper
  • MIDI song to style converter (computer-based application)

Let’s get the bad news over first: $6,599 USD (MSRP), $5,700 (MAP).

Style dynamics control: Increase the energy and dynamics of each style section in real-time by turning a knob. Instrument parts may be added or subtracted by the player with a single gesture. This is similar to the Adaptive Style idea (DGX-670) except the player has explicit control over the busy-ness of the auto-accompaniment.

Ambient drums: Use a live control to adjust the microphone distance from the drums. This adjusts the dry and ambient sound in real-time. The drum sounds have recorded drum ambience.

FM synthesis: Genos2 has both AWM2 and FM synthesis. Yamaha finally unlocked the FM engine in the SWP70! Genos sound designers are still on a 1980’s kick begun in Genos (gen 1). Now we get all of the DX7 classic sounds with real FM. And, of course, layered with anything and everything else.

Styles: Over 200 styles are brand new employing the new voices and dynamic drums. More 80’s: Throwback Pop, 80’s Sunday Pop, 80’s Funky Soul, 80’s Love Song, 80’s Soft Rock, 80’s Dance Pop, 90’s Dream House, Broadway Production, Action Anthem. The 80’s Funky Soul style is cool — especially if the unnecessary orchestration is backed out. Oh, no, more Schlager, but Yamaha do know who butters their bread!

Yamaha have finally improved style creation with the MIDI song to style converter application. I’ll have to take a closer look at this! 🙂 This application lets the user select the measures which are mapped to MAIN, FILL IN, and so forth. It’s about time.

Pianos: The CFX has more dynamic (velocity) layers. A brand new 80’s played-in, “German” character piano. The U1 upright has been updated. Genos2 adds more ethnic instruments, to pursue global sales, no doubt.

New voices: These new voices include Shakuhachi, nylon guitar, pop brass, orchestral brass, steel drums. Martin Harris handled the live stream demos — all very nice and well-played! I’m sure the golden agers are all digging the 90’s “four on the floor.”

There is a new Yamaha web site dedicated to Genos2. What is the URL???

Don’t forget to accessorize. Genos2 is going to maintain backward compatibility to Genos (gen 1). Customers get a five year extended warranty after registration. There are two new Genos2-focused expansion packs: DX7 pack and Genos complete pack. The complete pack contains Genos (gen 1) styles and voices not included in Genos2.

Comments and outstanding questions

I must give credit to Yamaha for re-working the Genos2 Owner’s Manual. The illustrations and descriptions are much improved. Good work! More vendors should pay attention to written documentation. [I’m talking to you, Hammond Suzuki.]

The other bad news for organ-punters like me — Genos2 did not get the new rotary speaker simulator. Genos2 is the same as Genos (gen 1) as far as B-3 organ is concerned.

The screen is tilted, but not tilt-able. The display is touted as “brighter and anti-reflective.”

Yamaha upgraded the CFX piano, but did not give Genos2 Virtual Resonance Modeling. In other words, Yamaha have once again maintained their product line silos. No cannibalization from Clavinova is allowed! The Genos piano collection is good: CFX, character grand, cinematic grand, felt piano, C7, U3 upright, and U1 upright. Still, not as good as Montage M. I love that felt piano, BTW.

The triple pedal is not supported. The Genos2 accessories include the FC4A sustain pedal which does not support half-pedaling. So, I doubt if Genos2 itself supports half-pedaling. The mystery back panel connector is for a subwoofer.

The new FM and ambient voices are described thus:

FM Voices: Characterized by dynamic changes in sound that cannot be achieved with PCM sound sources, since this is using a FM tone generator that is synthetic sound sources.

Ambient Drums, Ambient SFX Voices: Provides realistic and lively drum sounds that are difficult to achieve with DSP effects. When these Voices are used in a selected Style, you can adjust the ratio of wet (reverberant sound) and dry (unprocessed sound) sound in real time by using the Live Control knob/slider to which “Ambience Depth” is assigned.

As to slider behavior:

An LED meter on the right side of each slider displays the current value of the parameter corresponding to the slider, in the current Slider Assign Type. When any slider is operated, LIVE CONTROL view automatically displays the current Slider Assign Type and current values. When the slider’s position and the current parameter value are different, the current parameter value will be held until the slider’s position matches (catches) the value. Once they have matched, the slider’s position will be reflected to the parameter. When additional Slider Assign Types for Organ Flutes Voice are selected, the “catch” behavior described above does not apply and the slider position is always directly reflected.

The Genos2 Data List downloaded as a ZIP file containing an XLS file. What the what? And what is the bloomin’ URL for the Genos2 Web site?

The Yamaha USA site has Genos2 product pages.

Key Genos2 specifications

  • Keyboard: 76 key, Organ (FSX), Initial Touch/Aftertouch
  • Main display: TFT Color Wide VGA LCD, 800 Ă— 480 dots, 9 inch
  • Sub display: VA LCD (LIVE CONTROL View), 512 Ă— 48 dots
  • Polyphony: 128 for Preset AWM Voices + 128 for Expansion AWM Voices + 128 for FM Voices
  • Voices: 1,991 Voices + 75 Drum/SFX Kits
  • Styles: 800 (720 Pro, 69 Session, 11 Free Play)
  • Expansion voice memory: Approx. 3 GB
  • Internal memory (USER Drive): Approx. 15 GB
  • HDMI display: 1280 Ă— 720p max.
  • Dimensions (W Ă— D Ă— H): 1,234 mm Ă— 456 mm Ă— 151 mm (48-9/16″ Ă— 17-15/16″ Ă— 5-15/16″)
  • Weight 14.2 kg (31 lb, 5 oz)

Copyright © 2023 Paul J. Drongowski

Genos2 pre-game

Gotta say upfront, I don’t have a horse in the race when it comes to Yamaha Genos2 (to be announced Wednesday). Montage M8x, on the other hand, really seized my attention because it potentially could fit a real need — an 88-key piano for home. All of the Montage M extras (AN-X, big sub display, and so forth) would be gravy on the biscuits. In the end, I placed an order for a Clavinova CSP-170. [Still waiting for delivery.]

I’m quite happy with Genos (generation 1) and will be keeping it. The FSX action is pleasant and, oh, the sounds! It’s set up to my taste and needs — no good reason to change horses.

Still, I’m a technologist and I’m anxious to see how Genos2 features point to the future.

Pianos and more pianos

The Genos (gen 1) acoustic piano voices have always left players wanting, especially when compared to Montage (gen 1) and MODX. Genos has been trapped by its XG synthesis and effects architecture. Voices are limited to 8 elements making 18 element CFX an unlikely creation.

Yamaha engineers found a way to break down the 8 element limit in Montage M. A single part now may have up to 128 elements. If Yamaha incorporates the same breakthrough in Genos2 (G2), deep, detailed acoustic piano voices are possible.

The first G2 teaser video features piano slathered in reverb. I don’t think that’s an accident. Given that the lowly Yamaha DGX-670 has a great sounding CFX, it’s time for G2 to get game.

Piano Room and Smart Pianist

What are new piano voices without Yamaha Piano Room? Piano Room is the place to tweeze and tweak piano sounds to your liking. Open the piano lid, adjust brightness, etc.

Along with Piano Room, we might see Smart Pianist support for Genos2. The tablet-based Smart Pianist app provides the capabilities of Piano Room — and more. You can select voices, change settings and save everything in registrations. On the CSP series, the player can select and control auto-accompaniment styles, too. Smart Pianist brings sophisticated audio-to-chord and audio-to-score capabilities, too. Audio-to-score goes beyond the free Chord Tracker app, converting chords into honest to goodness musical notation. The musician can play from a standard chart without needing to know chord theory.

If Yamaha adds Genos2 to Smart Pianist, Genos2 will be the first (true) arranger keyboard with Smart Pianist support. This is a big deal. First released in January 2018, Smart Pianist is now a central, strategic piece in Yamaha’s digital piano ecosystem. Adding Genos2 will cement Smart Pianists role for years to come.

Whither VRM? Virtual Resonance Modeling enhances relatively static digital piano tones with body and string resonance. VRM has been slowly trickling down from high-end Clavinovas to the portable digital piano line. Will Genos2 get VRM Lite or enhanced VRM? Stay tuned.

What’s this?

Enlarged and enhanced G2 pictures show a new connector (?) centered on the rear panel. Along with new acoustic piano voices, will we see the new FC35 triple foot pedal? The FC35 connects through a large multi-pin DIN connector. Perhaps G2’s new connector is for the triple strike pedal. We shall soon see…

Vegas at night

Rotary encoders are another big ask. The second teaser video reveals what are quite likely rotary encoders in place of standard potentiometers. The encoders are surrounded by LEDs denoting the current knob value.

Later video and pictures show LEDs alongside the G2 sliders. It would be neat if the LEDs would show the initial slider value to be manually “caught.” That capability would certainly make it easier to play the drawbars in so-called Organ Flutes mode.

Speaking of drawbars, did G2 get the VCM rotary speaker DSP algorithm?

Tilt, but not tilt-able

The main and sub displays appear to be the same size as Genos (gen 1). The G2 front panel has a few new controls. Since Yamaha needed to remold the top chassis panel, they decided to increase the tilt of the main and sub displays. This change should improve readability, especially when seated at the instrument.

Space is the place

I give Ton on the PSR Tutorial Forum credit for making a great catch.

The first video is titled “REVelation” and the third video is titled “Real ambience.” Coincidentally, there are Cubase plug-in effects with similar names. The Cubase REVerence plug-in lets you import an impulse response from disk.

These spatial reverbs and enhancements are popular creative tools. They are also memory-hungry. Did Yamaha provide bigger DSP RAM on the G2 SWP70s? Could these effect algorithms be ported to Montage M? Remember, the “Real Distortion” guitar effects appeared in Tyros 5 before that were added to Motif XF in update 1.5. Could history repeat?

A new keybed?

Comparing the G2 chassis form against my Genos (gen 1), it looks like Yamaha have remolded the chassis bottom, too. It looks deeper, possibly to accommodate the downward tilt of the displays. Or maybe a new keybed, replacing FSX.

This close-up picture of the G2 keybed has been nagging me. The front face of the white keys appears taller than the FSX in front of me in the studio. The height-to-width ratio of the pictured key is about 0.52; the height-to-width ratio of an actual FSX key is 0.24. Did Yamaha develop a new keybed for Genos2?

Oh, so much is still unknown!

We can see the keys, the box, and the displays. It’s the stuff inside that we can’t see which is unknown and tantalizing. Until Wednesday! Unless some horrible, awful leak happens. 🙂

Copyright © 2023 Paul J. Drongowski

Yamaha DGX-670: Do you love me?

Yes, I played one! The pandemic has let up to the point where I can drag my old bod to music stores, again. Fortunately, I haven’t worn out my welcome with local shop owners and clerks (yet).

I don’t intend to run down the DGX-670 features in detail. The Yamaha DGX-670 has been on the market for two+ years and you can find all the details on the Yamaha Web page. Yamaha position the DGX as a “portable grand piano,” part of the “P” line of digital piano products.

And, as of late, my primary interest is in a digital piano that will help me to sharpen my piano skills. I want those skills to translate to the acoustic piano (Petrof acoustic grand) at church.

In that regard, the DGX-670 does not disappoint. The action is Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) and the main piano multi-sample is Yamaha CFX. The 670 has Yamaha’s Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM) which “reproduces the complicated interaction between both string and soundboard resonance.” The CFX sounds very good through the in-built amplification and speaker system: 2 x 6 Watt amplifier, 2 x (12cm + 5cm) speakers. If I have one immediate slam on the DGX-670, its front panel legends are difficult to read in poor light (black model).

Yamaha DGX-670 digital piano decked out in white

In short, the DGX-670 has me asking, “Do I really need to move up to the Yamaha P-515 digital piano?” This question is more complicated than it sounds, especially when you roll the Yamaha CK88 into the analysis!

The DGX-670 street price is $850 USD versus $1,600 for the P-515. The store which hosted my adventure was prepared to discount the DGX-670 to $750 — that’s half of a P-515. That’s half of a Yamaha CK88, too ($1,500 MAP).

It comes down to personal musical goals — and desire. 🙂 Let’s take each alternative separately.

The P-515 has the Natural Wood X action with escapement (NWX) and the glorious Bösendorfer Imperial. That’s a lot to argue against. The P-515 sound system is more capable: 2 x (15W + 5W biamplified) amplifier, and 2 x (12cm x 6cm) woofer and 2 x 2.5cm dome. The DGX-670 has a very nice 4.3 inch (480 Ă— 272 dots) LCD display that adds a splash of color to Yamaha’s drab black. The P-515 display has less resolution (128 x 64 dots) and is monochrome. [Yamaha should adopt the color display for the P-515 successor].

Those P-515 characteristics would be easy to live with. My biggest beef with the P-515, however, is the paucity and lower quality of its non-piano (AP or EP) sounds. The DGX-670 outstrips the P-515 for non-piano sounds. I quickly compared the DGX-670 voices against my once-beloved, owned and played PSR-S950. The DGX-670 is (roughly) a PSR-S950 without the Organ Flutes drawbar organ. I know these voices and would be very happy to have them in my piano instrument.

As to auto-accompaniment, the DGX-670 is “arranger lite.” It has styles and chord recognition. The styles are now represented in the Style File Format Guitar Edition (SFF GE) form. SFF GE makes the DGX-670 compatible with styles from the mid- and upper-end Yamaha arranger keyboards. A virtual ocean of styles are available at the PSR Tutorial web site as well as a growing community of DGX-670 players on the PSR Tutorial forum.

Yamaha do not say much about P-515 auto-accompaniment other than it’s bass plus drum, and that it follows chords. What is P-515’s chord recognition technique? Is it similar to full keyboard, A.I. recognition? Wish I knew more about this aspect of the P-515…

Regular visitors know that I test drove the Yamaha CK88, too. The CK88 is positioned in Yamaha’s stage keyboard product line. The sound system is comparable to the DGX-670: 2 x 6 Watt amplifier and 2 x (12cm x 6cm) speakers. The CK88 has the lower resolution (128×64 dots) monochrome display.

Piano-wise, the CK88 has the CFX multi-sample and GHS keybed. No VRM. No Bösendorfer. The CKs are well-equipped for drawbar and pipe organ. (The pipe organ multi-samples originated on Genos™.) The DGX-670 — and P-515, for that matter — are relatively deficient in the drawbar and pipe organ department. The CKs have a good selection of other non-piano voices. No Super Articulation. The CKs do not have auto-accompaniment of any kind.

So, if a player doesn’t care about drawbar organ and wants VRM, why not DGX-670 at half the price of a CK88?

At this point, I would be remiss to not mention slab weight:

    DGX-670 weight:  47.1 pounds (21.4kg) 
P-515 weight: 48.5 pounds (22.0kg)
CK88 weight: 28.8 pounds (13.1kg)

Yamaha’s engineers did a remarkable job of slimming the CK88 down to 28.8 pounds. The respectable GHS-equipped P-125 is 26 pounds and I doubt if Yamaha can design a lighter, robust, 88-key GHS keyboard.

I neglected the whole issue of connectivity and app support. Your mileage will vary. The DGX-670 does not have 5-pin DIN MIDI. That might be a deal-breaker for some folks. Smart Pianist does not presently support CK88. Look to Yamaha Soundmondo, instead.

I didn’t work the Yamaha CP88 into the analysis. After its updates, the CP88 is a virtual library of pianos! It’s also $2,600 USD (MAP), $1,000 higher than the three digital pianos in my analysis.

Finally, why did I enjoy playing the DGX-670 GHS and not so much the CK88. Yamaha swears that the GHS action is the same everywhere. If there is an external factor, perhaps it is the insane way trial pianos are set-up in stores? Often, I feel like a contortionist. (Forget reading sheet music in some settings, too.) Playing piano is, after all, a physical act.

If you enjoyed this analysis, please check out my comments about the Yamaha P-S500. I compare the P-S500 against the DGX-670.

Other reviews and comments about digital pianos:

Copyright © 2023 Paul J. Drongowski

Yamaha keyboards: Which amp (sim) is that?

While diving into overdrive and distortion effects for drawbar organ, I challenged readers to identify the real-world amplifiers on which Yamaha based its MODX (Montage, Genos) amp simulators. I took my own challenge over a cup of coffee today and made my own list of best guesses.

Yamaha introduced several new amp simulators during the 2013-2014 time-frame. They first appeared in Tyros 5 under the sobriquet “Real Distortion”. Next, they were added to Motif XF by way of the Motif XF OS1.5 update. Since then, the “Real Distortion” effect algorithms have trickled down to mid-level synthesizer and arranger keyboard products.

Without further ado, here are my best guesses:

Tweed Guy         Fender '59 Bassman Tweed (6L6GC, 4x10) 
Boutique DC Matchless DC-30 (EL84, 2x12)
US Combo Fender Twin Blackface (6L6GC, 2x12, Super Twin?)
Jazz Combo Roland JC-120 Jazz Chorus (Solid state, 2x12)
US High Gain Mesa Boogie Mark II or Mark III (6L6GC, 1x12)
British Lead Marshall Plexi Super Lead (EL34, 4x12)
British Combo Vox AC30 Top Boost (EL84, 1x12 and 2x12)
British Legend Marshall JCM 800 Lead (EL34, 4x12)
Distomp 1980s Yamaha distortion pedals (SHD-100/MBD-100)
Y-Amp Yamaha DG series guitar amplifiers and stomp
Small Stereo Fender inspired?
Multi FX Inspired by the Yamaha DG Stomp

Blake Angelos (Yamaha) wrote an early article which provides important clues. Unfortunately, the article doesn’t spill specific amplifier names.

A real Matchless DC-30 and the Boutique DC amp sim front panel

Better clues come from the faux front panel graphics on display in the Genos Mixer. These skeumorphic images resemble the actual amplifiers which inspired the amp simulators. More definitively, the control names resemble or are identical to the front panel knobs, switches and input channels of the original amps. The Fender-style graphic knobs threw me off at first, until I discovered that the first generations of Mesa/Boogie amps were housed in Fender Princetons.

There are a few inconsistencies, though. The “US Combo” clearly models Fender “blackface” amplifiers, most notably the famous Twin. The Fender Twin has a middle EQ knob, but does not have mid cut, width or sweep controls like the amp sim. Perhaps Yamaha’s software engineers replaced the single middle EQ knob with three other parameters giving great control over the mids? Or, maybe the software engineers had the Fender Super Twin in mind which has a five band EQ at fixed frequencies?

The Small Stereo Amp doesn’t claim any particular ancestor. The speaker types include Twin and Tweed, so maybe there is a Fender influence? Whatever its name, Small Stereo Amp is one of my favorites. It’s like Nando’s hot sauce; I use it anytime I want a little grunge.

The Distomp simulator is a blend of 1980s Yamaha distortion pedals. In particular, it combines controls from the SHD-100 Super Hard Distortion and MBD-100 Multi-Band Distortion pedals. Shred on, dudes.

The Y-Amp is clearly based on Yamaha’s own DG guitar amp series. The DG amplifiers are among the first digital modeling amplifiers. (Nerd note: DSP horsepower is delivered by a Yamaha proprietary DSP6 integrated circuit.) I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the DG amp sims and effect models jumped species and landed in Yamaha keyboard products, too.

Yamaha engineers often return to the same wellspring. The DG Series Amp Models (circa 2012) are:

    1) Lead 1 - Marshall 
2) Lead 2 - Soldano
3) Drive 1 - Fender Bassman
4) Drive 2 - Fender Twin
5) Crunch 1 - Vox AC30
6) Crunch 2 - Matchless
7) Clean 1 - Fender Twin Nasal Silverface
8) Clean 2 - Fender Twin Full Blackface

The list makes you go, “Hmmm?” “Soldano” brings the Soldano SLO-100 classic to mind.

Before VCM (Virtual Circuitry Modeling) there was DG’s ECM (Electric Circuit Modeling). In this vein, the Y-Amp sim offers a choice of power tube: 6L6GC, EL34, or KT66. These vacuum tubes were used in some of the most famous and collectible guitar amps:

6L6GC: Fender '59 Bassman and Twin, Ampeg B-15, Mesa/Boogie Mark I  
EL34: Marshall Plexi, DSL 100, Super Lead, Orange
KT66: Marshall JTM45 Bluesbreaker

Oddly, Y-Amp does not have an EL84 option (Vox AC30, Matchless DC-30). The KT66 is an improved version of the 6L6. The KT66 was first made in Britain by Marconi-Osram Valve Co. Ltd.

In addition to guitar amplifiers, the DG series included the DG Stomp multi-effects pedal. I can see where the DG Stomp might have inspired the MULTI FX pedal board simulation. The MULTI FX algorithm is a jack of all trades with compression, wah, distortion, phaser, delay and speaker simulation.

Hope you found this fun!

Before leaving, here is my speaker type decoder, once again, based on a little analysis and guess work.

    BS 4x12    British Stack 
AC 2x12 American Combo
AC 1x12 American Combo
AC 4x10 American Combo
BC 2x12 British Combo
AM 4x12 American Modern
YC 4x12 Yamaha Combo
JC 2x12 Jazz Chorus
OC 2x12 Orange Combo
OC 1x8 Orange Combo

Copyright © 2023 Paul J. Drongowski

God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen (ChordPro)

“God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen” by Jon Batiste, Judith Hill, and Stay Human really grooves and I wanted to get in on the fun(k). So, I started with Yamaha Chord Tracker and worked out a similar chord progression.

Wanting to hear the progression and jam on it, I wrote the progression and lyrics in Extended ChordPro:

{title: God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen} 
{Artist: Jon Batiste}
{Key: Cm}
{Time: 4/4}
# Style: JazzGuitarClub
{stylecode: 3878}
{Tempo: 120}

{start_accomp}

# Intro [Cm][*IA]

# Verse 1
God [Cm:2][*MA] rest ye [Bb/D:2] merry, [Eb5:2] gentle [Fm:2] men,
Let [Gm:2] nothing [Ab:2] you dis- [Gm:2] may. [G7:2][*FA]
Re- [Cm:2][*MA] member, [Bb/D:2] Christ our [Eb5:2] Sa- [Fm:2] vior was
[Gm:2] Born on [Ab:2] Christmas [Gm:2][*FA] day. [C7:2]
To [Fm:2][*MA] save us [Bb:2] all from [Eb5:2] Satan's [AbMaj7:2] pow'r when

[Eb5:2] We were [Dm:2] gone a- [Bb/D:2] stray. [Bb:2]
O [Eb5:2] Ti- [Ab:2] dings of [Dm:2] com- [Gaug:2] fort and
[Cm:2] Joy, [Fm7:2] Comfort and [Bb7][*FA] joy.
O [Eb5:2][*MA] Ti- [Ab:2] dings of [Dm:2] com- [Gaug:2][*FA] fort and

# Funky interlude

[Cm7:2][*MB] joy. [F:2] ---- [Cm7:2] ---- [F:2] ----
[Cm7:2] ---- [F:2] ---- [Cm7:2] ---- [F:2][*FB] ----

# Ending
[Cm7-9][*EA] --------

Extended ChordPro adds auto-accompaniment features to the well-known and widely used ChordPro song format. I translated the ChordPro to a Yamaha-compatible auto-accompaniment file and played it on Genos™.

In “God Rest Ye,” you’ll notice the new extensions right away. There are a few more directives like: {stylecode: 3878} and {start_accomp}. Chord symbols are enhanced with a beat count, e.g., “[Cm:2]“, placing chord changes on beats within a measure. Annotations indicate auto-accompaniment section changes. For example, “[*MA]” and “[*FA]” mean “Main section A” and “Fill in A”, respectively.

Getting to hear the progression — not just play it by hand — was a huge help. I found a few places where a minor chord was required instead of a major. Play-back encouraged me to listen critically and to find a few hipper voicings.

If you would like a copy of the Java program (cp2mid) which translates Extended ChordPro to a Yamaha auto-accompaniment Standard MIDI File, here is a pointer to the ZIP file page. If you would like more information, please see the ChordPro auto-accompaniment example and demo and my article with ideas and uses for Extended ChordPro auto-accompaniment.

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

ChordPro auto-accompaniment

Before we close out the year, a Christmas gift!

Last January, I developed and wrote about “cp2mid“, a Java program to convert extended ChordPro files to a Yamaha accompaniment MIDI files. cp2mid lets someone compose in extended ChordPro format and play the composition on a Yamaha arranger in an auto-accompaniment style of your own choosing. If you don’t feel like composing, just grab one of the many ChordPro songs on the Web, clean it up, translate it, and play it.

You’ve probably seen ChordPro on the interwebs. It looks like:

# A simple ChordPro example 

{title: God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen}

God [Cm] rest ye merry, [Cm] gentlemen,
Let [Ab] nothing you dis[G7]may.
Re [Cm] member, Christ our [Cm] Savior
Was [Ab] born on Christmas [G7] day.

Extended ChordPro adds a few new directives (the things between curly braces) and tightens up the notion of musical time in order to mark measures and place chord changes within measures.

cp2mid translates the chords and lyrics into a Standard MIDI File (SMF). The SMF contains all the magic needed to play an auto-accompaniment on a supporting Yamaha arranger keyboard. (PSR E series, unfortunately, is out of luck.)

If you would like more information, here are some links to dive into:

The first three posts are essential reading for cp2mid users. The last two posts are intended for coders and other technically inclined folks.

Oh, yeah, you’ll need the ZIP file with example songs and cp2mid Java code.

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

V3 Sound YAMMEX: Progress report

Here’s a quick update on my progress with the V3 Sound YAMMEX XXL sound module.

The V3 Sound XXL series are very compact, light-weight MIDI sound modules based on the Dream S.A.S. SAM5716B synthesis engine. The YAMMEX and its sister, the V3 Sound Grand Piano XXL, have hundreds of high quality voices — 3GBytes of factory samples in a 4GByte waveform memory. The modules also provide two multi-effect (MFX) pipelines which enrich the sound.

V3 Sound YAMMEX XXL expansion module

The XXL modules do not have a built-in user interface (UI) having no display or buttons for selecting voices. All sounds and effects are selected through the MIDI and USB-A ports. V3 Sound provide the tablet-based V3 Sound Control app and two comprehensive MIDI Designer UI templates. The V3 Sound Control app, unfortunately, does not support the YAMMEX. V3 Sound considers the YAMMEX as a Genos/PSR expansion only and expect users to control YAMMEX through a set of predefined voice (VCE) files and the normal Genos/PSR voice selection process.

Well, those VCE files do send MIDI Bank Select MSB, Bank Select LSB and Program Change messages. I can now assure you that these messages are enough to select YAMMEX voices even if you are not using a Genos or PSR.

Yamaha MODX Zone Master works quite well. You need to build MODX Performances consisting of external MIDI zones. Thanks to Zone Master you can select, split and layer YAMMEX voices. The trick is to assign a separate YAMMEX voice to each MIDI channel and use Zone Master channel and note ranges to affect splits and layers.

I have also successfully used the Arturia Keylab Essential with YAMMEX. It took only 15 minutes work to make a control template using Arturia’s MIDI Control Center application. I assigned eight of my favorite YAMMEX voices to the eight Keylab pads and assigned the most common MIDI continuous controllers to the knobs and sliders.

Both of these scenarios are dirt-simple involving a direct 5-pin MIDI connection. Unfortunately, Keylab Essential by itself cannot do splits and layers over 5-pin MIDI. Keylab Essential does not provide the functional equivalent of Zone Master. Keylab Essential can send on only one MIDI channel at a time and doesn’t implement the concept of key ranges (zones). Keylab Essential also restricts the number of selectable voices to what you can programmed into its key pads.

All is not lost, however, as MIDI Designer once again comes to the rescue. First, you need to make connections:

                                 iPad 
|
Keyboard controller --> iRig MIDI --> YAMMEX

The keyboard controller sends MIDI over a 5-pin cable to the iPad which, in turn, sends MIDI to the YAMMEX over a second 5-pin cable. Bonus: I successfully tested Bluetooth MIDI input from Korg Microkey Air. The iPad acts as a Bluetooth wireless interface to YAMMEX.

The iPad runs two applications: StreamByter and MIDI Designer:

    MIDI IN --> StreamByter --> MIDI Designer --> MIDI OUT

Incoming note messages are passed THRU StreamByter and MIDI Designer. StreamByter remaps (rechannelizes) the MIDI notes to three zones/streams:

    Channel 1: UPPER1 
Channel 2: UPPER2
Channel 4: LOWER

UPPER1 and UPPER2 form a two-voice layer above the split point. LOWER is a solo left-hand voice below the split point. I borrowed this simple zone structure from the Casio CT-S1000V. It’s intuitive and is quite powerful even in its simplicity.

StreamByter maps and mangles MIDI data according to user-defined rules. The rules are rather cryptic, so I refer you to the StreamByter documentation. Currently, I am using the following rules to split/layer:

    NX 00-3A = X3 
NX 3A-7F = X0
NX 3A-7F = X1 +C

Yes, the UPPER and LOWER zones have a one note overlap. I’m still experimenting and may make the overlap larger, if a bigger overlap is useful. I don’t like abrupt breaks between upper and lower zones.

Well, the rest of the work is done by MIDI Designer and my YAMMEX control template. The V3 Sound templates struck me as too complicated — the main reason why I went with “the Casio voice structure” and my own template. Here is the first prototype, work-in-progress template:

MIDI Designer template for YAMMEX (work in progress)

There are eight radio buttons to select the UPPER1, UPPER2, and LOWER voices. [Well, I need to add three more voices to LOWER, as you can see.] These are my favorite YAMMEX voices and they will let me build my most frequently used combinations. Knobs set the voice and reverb level for each zone.

The MFX controls do not function correctly at this time. I seem to be missing some magic; YAMMEX is not responding to the MIDI messages sent by the template even though the V3 Sound “factory” template sends the same darned messages! At this point, I need to ask V3 Sound for advice.

All in all, things are coming along — many successes, a few failures. That’s to be expected at this stage!

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski


In the house: V3 Sound YAMMEX XXL

Thought I would post a quick note about the new unit under test — the V3 Sound YAMMEX XXL tone module. The YAMMEX is a member of the V3 Sound XXL family of tone modules. They all share the same triangular shape and are light as a feather:

V3 Sound YAMMEX XXL expansion tone module

The lump-in-the-middle power supply is roughly the same weight!

You might have seen and heard Piano Man Chuck demonstrate the V3 Sound Grand Piano XXL module. [Piano Man Chuck is a V3 Sound dealer, BTW.] Well, the YAMMEX has the same sound set as the Grand Piano XXL. The main differences are:

  • The MIDI bank and program change layouts are different: Grand Piano XXL for general use as an expander, YAMMEX XXL as a Genos/PSR expander.
  • Grand Piano XXL is supported by the V3 Sound Control app; the YAMMEX XXL is not.
  • Grand Piano XXL is supported by two different MIDI Designer templates; the YAMMEX is not.
  • YAMMEX XXL voices are selected using custom Genos/PSR user voices.

YAMMEX XXL arrives from the factory with a USB flash drive containing the custom user voices (VCE files) needed to select voices through Genos/PSR. It’s all described in the YAMMEX XXL manual. [Henceforth, “Yammex” means “YAMMEX XXL”.]

I found a Yammex on ebay at a price that was impossible to refuse. It would be a shame to confine Yammex to Genos duty alone, so I studied the heck out of its MIDI implementation. I also examined the VCE files available from the V3 Sound Web site. Hmmm, looks like it’s a simple matter of uttering the appropriate Bank Select MSB, Bank Select LSB and Program Change messages. We can do that!

An inquiry to V3 Sound about compatibility was answered quickly, but implied that Yammex was only for Genos/MIDI. If you know MIDI and your controller’s capabilities, and if you don’t mind a little work, Yammex definitely can do more than Genos/PSR.

I was sorely tempted by the V3 Sound XXL series because it is based on the Dream S.A.S. SAM5716B synthesis chip. After hearing the SAM2635 and its GM/GS sound set, I wanted to hear what a high-end Dream chip could do with 3GBytes of professionally produced instrument samples. Cut to the chase, V3 Sound do not disappoint especially at the price I paid.

Jeff’s Music Gear is Sweetwater!

The box arrives. I open the shipping carton and what the? The Yammex box is in fine shape, but is covered in round “Demo” labels. I instantly smell “Sweetwater”. And there’s candy, and a Sweetwater “Thank You” card. The ebay seller is Jeff’s Music Gear. After a Google, I discover that Jeff’s Music Gear is Sweetwater’s ebay consignment shop! Nice to know that I was in good hands all along.

OK, then, plug everything up using Yamaha MODX as a controller. (See my article about Yamaha MODX Zone Master.) Ooops, no flashing MIDI light and no sound. I’m already composing a message to Jeff’s when I remember this note in the Yammex manual:

No sound? The YAMMEX XXL sound expander only creates a tone when you call up a sound from the V3 folder in your keyboard’s display. Just connecting it to your keyboard is not enough.

They aren’t kidding! I select a voice through the MODX Zone Master screen and suddenly the MIDI light starts flashing and Yammex starts talking. Delete the message to Jeff’s.

One other note from the manual is helpful during bring up:

Testing MIDI connections and settings. After connecting your MIDI cable and making sure your MIDI settings are correct, select a V3 User Voice. The MIDI LED on the YAMMEX XXL should now blink with every keystroke.

I find this behavior to be a dubious design decision. The purpose of a MIDI light is to indicate MIDI reception under any condition. While troubleshooting, I connected the Yammex THRU port to MIDI-OX on a PC and verified MIDI operation. Most of V3 customers will not be that savvy…

I’ve just begun auditioning sounds and already I’m pleased. I like and prefer the Bösendorfer Imperial 290 (Vienna) over the Steinway Model D (Hamburg). I fell in love with Bösendorfer when I first touched one in 1980. The electric pianos are good although too clean and polite. The organ samples are damned good. There are two flavors: No Leslie and Leslie sampled in. Sans-Leslie voices are meant to be dirtied up by an external pedal. I’ll try the Electro-Harmonix Lester K for spin and throw some overdrive on the EPs, too.

I like the Oberheim pads — another love. The classical strings are solid. That’s as far as I’ve gotten into the sound set. I’m looking forward to hearing the rest.

As to the supplied USB flash drive, the previous customer zorched the factory VCE files. I found an X6A file instead which I recognize as a Yamaha MOXF dump file. I guess the previous customer tried Yammex with MOXF and was disappointed. Fortunately, V3 Sound provide the Genos/PSR VCE files on their Web site. The supplied drive is only 64MB. [Not really a complaint.]

Experiments to come? Once I get my faves down to 8, 16 voices or so, I’ll configure the Arturia Keylab Essential. The extra knobs and sliders will come in handy. Also, I will whip up a simplified MIDI Designer template for the Yammex. The existing templates are comprehensive — yet overwhelming. I’m thinking about a UI similar to Korg Module. Those Korg folks are definitely on to something. Simplicity is king. MIDI Designer (with StreamByter) on iPad should give me splits and layers — maybe even a wireless Bluetooth interface to Yammex? Finally, Dream multi-FX.

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

“P” is for “piano”: Yamaha P-S500 digital piano

While we’re distracted with “CK”, “AN”, and whatnot, Yamaha sneaks out a new P-series digital piano in Europe: the Yamaha P-S500.

Natch, you can read all about the P-S500 at Yamaha’s European web site. Physically, it’s a minimalist slab that’s designed primarily for the home or small studio market segments. Cost is about 2,100 Euro and I would expect it to retail for about $2000 USD in the States.

Yamaha P-S500 digital piano

Basic features [courtesy of Yamaha] are:

  • Compatible with Smart Pianist app installed to a smart device
  • Stream Lights feature helps you perform even if you can’t read music notation
  • Enjoy playing along with the 403 preset Songs, covering a wide range of genres from pop music to classical music
  • Audio To Score function converts your favorite audio songs into piano accompaniment scores
  • Authentic Yamaha CFX & Bösendorfer Imperial concert grand piano Voices
  • Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM)
  • 88-note weighted GHS keyboard
  • Huge variety of 660 high-quality instrument Voices, including Super Articulation Voices
  • Built-in Auto Accompaniment features with 370 Styles
  • Microphone input and automatic Vocal Harmony

Auto-accompaniment, styles, Super Articulation voices? We’ve seen these features in the DGX series, notably, the most recent DGX-670 model. The table below compares the P-S500 against the DGX-670. The DGX-670, by the way, goes for considerably less dough: $850 USD.

                DGX-670           P-S500 
----------------- ---------------------------------
Main piano: Yamaha CFX CFX, Bösendorfer Imperial
VRM: Yes Yes
Key-off sound: Yes Yes
Action: GHS GHS
Piano Room: Yes Yes
PB wheel: Yes No
Dual/layer: Yes Yes
Split: Yes Yes
USB audio: Play/record Play/record
Bluetooth: Yes Not built-in (optional)
Amplification: 2 x 6W 2 x (20W + 6W)
Speakers: 2 x (12cm + 5cm) 2 x (12cm x 6cm oval+2.5cm dome)
Display: 480x272 color 80x16 mono LCD
Weight 47.2 pounds 48.1 pounds

Here’s the decoder ring for Yamaha acronyms: Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM), Graded Hammer Standard (GHS), Super Articulation (SA), Cool (velocity switched), Live (stereo), Organ Flute (drawbar organ).

The P-S500 looks to be the upscale, uptown sibling of the DGX-670. At 48 pounds, I don’t think you’ll want to schlep the P-S500 out of the house very often. In terms of styles and voices, the P-S500 is superior:

                          DGX-670  P-S500 
------- ------
Total voices 601 660
VRM voices 9 13
SA voices 49 111
Natural voices 11 25
Sweet voices 26 27
Cool voices 53 47
Live voices 68 58
Organ Flute voices 0 29
Total styles 263 370
Pro styles 215 328
Session styles 19 25
Free Play styles 0 3
Pianist styles 29 13
Drum Kits 29 29

The P-S500 factory voice set includes many of my favorites. If you’re looking for a more than decent, mid-level keyboard with auto-accompaniment and a graded hammer keyboard, the P-S500 is worth a look. Versus a mid-level arranger keyboard, you’re still giving up a pitch bend wheel, multi-pads, style control buttons, MIDI record/edit, etc. If you just want to play and have a good piano experience, I’d go with the P-S500 in a heartbeat. (The DGX-670 is no slouch, either.)

There are many other differences that I’ve glossed over. So, if you’re trying to decide between DGX-670, an arranger or the P-S500, be sure to dig into the manuals and data list files. Yamaha doesn’t always make it easy to compare, especially as to your specific musical goals and use cases.

One enormous difference needs to be emphasized, however. The P-S500 front panel is utterly minimalist. If you want to exploit the P-S500 to its fullest, you must use the P-S500 with the Yamaha Smart Pianist app on a tablet (Apple or Android). In this respect, the P-S500 is more like the CSP series of digital pianos for the home. It’s like a CSP without the furniture. The CSP models have enhanced GH3X or NWX keybeds which improve the piano playing experience. Given that the Smart Pianist is almost a necessity, it’s kind of weird (cheap) to omit built-in Bluetooth.

Yamaha are certainly giving us choices!

A final, electronics nerd comment. While studying the internal design of current arranger, synth and digital piano products, the designs often seem like a deconstructed tablet connected to a keybed, tone generator and MIDI/USB interface. The digital electronics are remarkably similar. With the P-S500 and the CSP series, it’s like Yamaha said “Aw, the heck with it” and moved functionality out of the piano (arranger, synth) chassis into a stock, commercial tablet like iPad or Google Pixel tablet. I don’t think we have seen the end of this approach to instrument design…

Other reviews and comments about digital pianos:

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski