Casio CT-S1000V: First impressions

After test driving the Casio CT-S1 and CT-S410, I took the plunge and bought a Casio CT-S1000V (AiX Sound Source with Vocal Synthesis, $450USD street). The price was irresistible after making a trade-in. (The Yamaha SHS-500 Sonogenic retired.)

In terms of build quality, the Casio CT-S1000V is robust enough for light to moderate gigging. It feels solid. I miss the fabric speaker covering (Casio CT-S1) as it is a touch of class. I suspect that fabric would get dirty on gigs, however. I wouldn’t park any drinks on this keyboard (or any keyboard) with everything exposed! Yep, it weighs ten pounds, not bad for a keyboard with in-built speakers.

Casio CT-S1000V

The power supply is a small lump-in-the-middle brick. The mains lead is rather short with one of those “figure 8” IEC 60320 C7 plugs. Other accessories include a music stand and a Casio WU-BT10 Bluetooth dongle — don’t lose that tiny little bugger! The music stand isn’t super-robust and I’m not sure that I want to park a heavy binder o’tunes on it. It’s also too low for my reading glasses and I will probably stick to my usual tripod music stand.

The CT-S1000V keybed is rather nice for a keyboard in this price range. The keys are squared off and piano-like although there’s no hammer simulation, of course. The keys are evenly spaced, are level, and don’t wobble too much. The keys have a textured surface similar to the Roland GO:KEYS. The throw is a little bit light and soft, not unpleasant. (BTW, I couldn’t stand the Roland GO:KEYS and returned it due to keybed issues.)

I can hand-swipe without cutting my hands. I don’t know how the keys will stand up to this kind of abuse in the long run. Plus, this board is so light, I’m afraid of throwing it off the keyboard stand when swiping!

The speaker sound is OK. I regard the speakers as “courtesy speakers.” Sometimes it’s convenient to push only one switch and start playing. They’re loud enough for my studio room, maybe loud enough for the church gig where we don’t generate a lot of stage volume. They don’t get buzzy at loud volume. Since I don’t play at very loud volume at home, I’m good with that. Casio wisely blessed the CT-S1000V with 1/4″ stereo output jacks so I can send the CT to the church PA.

I read just enough of the manual to enable Active DSP, which assigns DSP parameters to the knobs. With an organ tone selected, turning knob 1 (K1) switched between slow and fast rotary speaker speed. Wish there was a way to assign rotary speed to a button or the foot switch… I need to experiment more with Active DSP. Gotta experiment with splits and layers, too. I guess everything is saved to a registration, but we’ll find out!

I played with Vocal Synthesis enough to know there are multiple Vocalists. Some Vocalists are more natural than others. One of the Vocalists is “Death Voice” and I would like to uncork that one in church. 🙂

Quite a playable instrument. I haven’t listened to any of the rhythms yet because I’m mostly interested in flat-out playing. Switching sections (intro, main, fill, etc.) with the buttons below the display reminds me of switching arpeggios on the Yamaha MOX/MOXF.

Hope these impressions help!

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

Ye olde Yamaha Dance Kit

Ya learn somethin’ every day. Thanks for to Mark — my neighborhood to the north in Vancouver — who looped me in.

As one might expect, Yamaha have updated their drum kit samples over the years. Who knew — the DanceKit circa 2000 is more heavy, punchy and analog than present-day DanceKit. According to Mark (and Musicnik), the Standard Kit had more punch back in the day.

The table below summaries the instruments in the Yamaha Standard Kit and Dance Kit:

                    Standard Kit      Dance Kit 
Keyboard MIDI 127/000/001 127/000/28
-------- -------- ---------------- ---------------
40 E 1 28 E 0 Brush Tap Swirl Reverse Cymbal *
41 F 1 29 F 0 Snare Roll Snare Roll
42 F# 1 30 F# 0 Castanet Hi Q 2 *
43 G 1 31 G 0 Snare Soft Snare Techno *
44 G# 1 32 G# 0 Sticks Sticks
45 A 1 33 A 0 Bass Drum Soft Kick Techno Q *
46 A# 1 34 A# 0 Open Rim Shot Rim Gate *
47 B 1 35 B 0 Bass Drum Hard Kick Techno L *
48 C 2 36 C 1 Bass Drum Kick Techno 2 *
49 C# 2 37 C# 1 Side Stick Side Stick Analog *
50 D 2 38 D 1 Snare Snare Clap *
51 D# 2 39 D# 1 Hand Clap Hand Clap
52 E 2 40 E 1 Snare Tight Snare Dry *
53 F 2 41 F 1 Floor Tom L Tom Analog 1 *
54 F# 2 42 F# 1 Hi-Hat Closed Hi-Hat Close Analog 1 *
55 G 2 43 G 1 Floor Tom H Tom Analog 2 *
56 G# 2 44 G# 1 Hi-Hat Pedal Hi-Hat Close Analog 2 *
57 A 2 45 A 1 Low Tom Tom Analog 3 *
58 A# 2 46 A# 1 Hi-Hat Open Hi-Hat Open Analog *
59 B 2 47 B 1 Mid Tom L Tom Analog 4 *
60 C 3 48 C 2 Mid Tom H Tom Analog 5 *
61 C# 3 49 C# 2 Crash Cymbal 1 Cymbal Analog *
62 D 3 50 D 2 High Tom Tom Analog 6 *
63 D# 3 51 D# 2 Ride Cymbal 1 Ride Cymbal 1
64 E 3 52 E 2 Chinese Cymbal Chinese Cymbal
65 F 3 53 F 2 Ride Cymbal Cup Ride Cymbal Cup
66 F# 3 54 F# 2 Tambourine Tambourine
67 G 3 55 G 2 Splash Cymbal Splash Cymbal
68 G# 3 56 G# 2 Cowbell Cowbell Analog *
69 A 3 57 A 2 Crash Cymbal 2 Crash Cymbal 2
70 A# 3 58 A# 2 Vibraslap Vibraslap
71 B 3 59 B 2 Ride Cymbal 2 Ride Cymbal 2
72 C 4 60 C 3 Bongo H Bongo H
73 C# 4 61 C# 3 Bongo L Bongo L
74 D 4 62 D 3 Conga H Mute Conga Analog H *
75 D# 4 63 D# 3 Conga H Open Conga Analog M *
76 E 4 64 E 3 Conga L Conga Analog L *
77 F 4 65 F 3 Timbale H Timbale H 7
8 F# 4 66 F# 3 Timbale L Timbale L
79 G 4 67 G 3 Agogo H Agogo H
80 G# 4 68 G# 3 Agogo L Agogo L
81 A 4 69 A 3 Cabasa Cabasa
82 A# 4 70 A# 3 Maracas Maracas 2 *
83 B 4 71 B 3 Samba Whistle H Samba Whistle H
84 C 5 72 C 4 Samba Whistle L Samba Whistle L
85 C# 5 73 C# 4 Guiro Short Guiro Short
86 D 5 74 D 4 Guiro Long Guiro Long
87 D# 5 75 D# 4 Claves Claves 2 *
88 E 5 76 E 4 Wood Block H Wood Block H
89 F 5 77 F 4 Wood Block L Wood Block L
90 F# 5 78 F# 4 Cuica Mute Scratch H *
91 G 5 79 G 4 Cuica Open Scratch L *

The starred (“*”) entries denote analog drum machine samples.

I decided to do a side-by-side comparison. I first recorded the DanceKit samples as dry as possible on the Yamaha PSS-A50 and the Yamaha QY-70 (circa 1997). Then I matched everything up, ignoring the toms and a few extraneous instruments.

You’ll hear all the PSS-A50 examples first followed by all of the QY70 examples. I’ll let you decide as to your personal preference. Although I tried to get the A50 dry, there seems to be a hint of reverb remaining.

Without further ado, here is a ZIP file containing the WAV for all of the Yamaha QY-70 Dance Kit instruments starting from the bottom of the keyboard to the top. Have fun! Slice and dice everything into audio mirepois.

If a drum machine plays in the forest and no one is around, does it still make a sound? 🙂

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

Casio speech synthesis technology

The voice synthesis in Casio’s new CT-S1000V keyboard raised quite a bit of interest on the Web, including my own curiosity.

I installed the Casio Lyric Creator app on my iPad just to see what I can see. Lo and behold, there is a long list of open source licensing statements which identify some of the voice synthesis technology in the app and the keyboard itself. Let’s take a look starting with the top of the list.

HMM-based speech synthesis engine, HTS_engine, developed by the HTS Working Group. That’s a lot of acronyms and shoulders to stand on:

  • HMM: Hidden Markov model
  • HTS: An HMM-based speech synthesis system
  • SPTK: Speech Signal Processing Toolkit

The HTS Working Group is a voluntary group developing the HMM-based speech synthesis system HTS. The software bears a joint copyright from two institutions:

  • Nagoya Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science, and
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering

The HTS_engine API is released under the Modified BSD license. I won’t quote such chapter and verse everywhere, but it gives you a sense of the distribution terms and conditions. Read about HTS version 2 in “The HMM-based Speech Synthesis System (HTS) Version 2.0“, by Heiga Zen, et al., Sixth ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, 2007.

HMM-based singing voice synthesis system, Sinsy, developed by the Sinsy Working Group. This software bears the copyright of Nagoya Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science.

Speak Signal Processing Toolkit, SPTK, developed by the SPTK Working Group. Again, the toolkit has a joint copyright:

  • Nagoya Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science, and
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering

CRF+ by Taku Kudo. “CRF” is an acronym for “conditional random fields”. CRFs are a class of statistical modeling methods that are used in pattern recognition and machine learning.

The developers also acknowledge other work which was used during speech analysis:

  • WORLD: A high-quality speech analysis and synthesis system based on vocoding.
  • CMUdict: The CMU Pronouncing Dictionary from Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (my old school)
  • Festival Speech Synthesis System, Centre for Speech Technology Research, University of Edinburgh, UK.

For (more than) an introduction to HMM-based speech synthesis, try: “An Introduction to HMM-Based Speech Synthesis” by Junichi Yamagishi, October 2006. That should be enough math for you. 🙂 This presentation is super helpful, too.

Casio’s voice synthesis technology is not Yamaha Vocaloid™. Vocaloid™, by the way, is a registered trademark belonging to Yamaha. I have seen punters on the Web attribute the technology to Vocaloid or Yamaha. “Oh, they must have licensed it.” Wrong. Please do not refer to Casio’s tech as “Vocaloid” as this is technically incorrect and a misuse of Yamaha’s trademark.

Plus, we want to give credit where credit is due. Casio have staked out their IP territory in a series of patents filed on their behalf.

Want more information? See Casio singing synthesis in pictures.

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

Yamaha PSR-E473 and PSR-EW425

The PSR-E473 and PSR-EW425 continue the evolution of the Yamaha E-series arranger keyboards.

Yamaha PSR-E473 and PSR-EW425 arranger keyboards

Main features are:

  • PSR-E473: 61 keys, PSR-EW425: 76 keys
  • Super Articulation Lite voices and articulation button
  • 820 voices (including 43 Super Articulation Lite)
  • Category access buttons to select voices
  • 290 auto-accompaniment styles
  • Two DSP effect channels (DSP1 and DSP2)
    • DSP1: 41 types of DSP insertion effects
    • DSP2: 12 effect types
  • New quick sampling user interface (44.1kHz, 16-bit, stereo, 9.6 sec)
  • Motion effects (57 types) and motion effect button
  • Mega Boost (adds +6dB to the apparent volume)
  • Two live control knobs
  • 1/4″ main audio out (R, L/L+R)

Pricing has not been announced as of this writing.

The PSR-EW425 has an exclusive organ sound from the YC stage keyboards. Although the E473 and EW425 share ten new drawbar organ voices, the EW425 has some extra tricks. Quoting Yamaha’s documentation, “On the PSR-EW425, a percussive click sound at key-on/key-off and a leakage sound are added, providing more realistic vintage organ sounds.”

DSP1 is automatically assigned to the main voice. DSP2 can be assigned to any part. DSP2 is assigned to all parts (including the keyboard and backing) by default. There is a dedicated DSP2 button on the front panel which provides direct access to DSP2 and turns it ON and OFF. You can choose the effect type for each DSP unit. Effect parameter editing is limited to that available through the Live Control knobs.

PSR-E473 and PSR-EW425 effect routing [Yamaha]

With reverb, chorus and two DSP effect units, effect routing (above) is more sophisticated than earlier E-series models. The routing adheres to the XG architecture. The MIDI implementation does not provide SysEx for effect selection and routing. (Well, at least it’s not documented…)

Motion effects are implemented via MIDI pitch bend and continuous control messages. (The approach is similar to the Yamaha PSS-A50.) Message-heavy effects will cut into song size when recording into MIDI.

The PSR-EW425 has two 12cm speakers and its amplifiers produce 12W per channel. The PSR-EW425 requires six D size batteries, which will affect final weight. The PSR-EW425 weighs 8.3kg (18 pounds, 5 ounces) without batteries.

The PSR-E473 requires six AA size batteries. The PSR-E473 weighs 7.0kg (15 pounds, 7 ounces) without batteries.

Live control knobs can be assigned to:

  • Keyboard:
    • Filter cutoff and resonance
    • Reverb and chorus level
    • DSP1 parameters A and B
  • Backing:
    • Filter cutoff and resonance
    • Reverb and chorus level
    • Volume balance and retrigger rate
  • System:
    • DSP2 parameter A and B

Check out my pre-announcement post. See how well I did. 🙂

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

New Casio portable keyboards

Casio CT-S1000V

Casio have announced the new CT-S1000V keyboard with vocal synthesis:

  • 61 full-size touch response keys plus pitch bend wheel
  • 64 voice polyphony
  • 3 assignable knobs for controlling modulation, effects, filters, and more
  • 800 AiX-powered Tones and 243 full accompaniment Rhythms
  • Advanced Tones (including vintage keyboards
  • Editable DSP effects (100 effects)
  • Split and layer (Upper 1/2, Lower 1)
  • Powerful bass-reflex stereo speaker system with surround effect
  • Two 13cm by 6cm speakers, 2.5W per channel
  • Audio sampler and 6-track MIDI recorder (sequencer)
  • Audio sample format: WAV, 44kHz, 16-bit, stereo
  • Vocal synthesis with personalized lyrics via the free Lyric Creator app
  • Vocal format: 44kHz, 16-bit, mono
  • Bright backlit LCD display with easy, intuitive interface
  • Strap pins for playing anywhere
  • 1/4″ line outputs to connect to mixers, PA systems, etc.
  • Class-compliant USB-MIDI connects to the free Casio Music Space iOS/Android app
  • Includes WU-BT01 Bluetooth MIDI/Audio adapter
  • Optional 6xAA battery power (AC adapter and music rest included)
  • Weight: 10 pounds
  • $449.99 USD (street)
Casio CT-S1000V portable keyboard with vocal synthesis

Quoting the Casio web site:

The CT-S1000V does what no other keyboard can do: Speak or type your lyrics into the free Lyric Creator app for iOS/Android, transfer them to the CT-S1000V, and play the keys to hear your words come alive. Choose from multiple vocalist models, and adjust age, vibrato, portamento and other parameters in real time. It can produce choirs, robotic sounds, vocoder-like textures, and more. You can even create a custom vocalist based on an audio recording.

Availability — “Coming soon”.

Please see my pre-announcement post for more pictures and information. I also have posted a list of recent Casio patents related to sound synthesis and vocal synthesis.

Vocal Synthesis

According to Casio, you can create lyrics using their tablet-/phone-based Lyric Creator app, transfer them to the CT-S1000V, and play them using the keys. You can dynamically change characteristics like age, gender, portamento and vibrato in real time. Of course, you can mangle the sound with DSP effects, too. The front panel knobs are assignable for real time control.

NOTE mode chooses how the lyrics play-back when keys are pressed. You can play a word or syllable with each key press or you can play choral harmonies. PHRASE mode follows your timing. Legato gestures change note (pitch) while the phrase is playing. You can also select a syllable with your left hand and use your right hand to play it.

Casio Lyric Creator [Casio]

Lyric Creator lets you edit, save and share lyrics. Lyrics can be imported from MusicXML files.

Casio CT-S500

Casio have announced the new CT-S500:

  • 61 full-size touch response keys plus pitch bend wheel
  • 64 voice polyphony
  • 3 assignable knobs for controlling modulation, effects, filters, and more
  • Editable DSP effects (100 effects)
  • Audio sampler and 6-track MIDI recorder (sequencer)
  • 1/4″ line outputs to connect to mixers, PA systems, etc.
  • Includes WU-BT01 Bluetooth MIDI/Audio adapter
  • Bright backlit LCD display with easy, intuitive interface
  • 800 AiX-powered Tones and 243 full accompaniment Rhythms
  • Advanced Tones (including vintage keyboards)
  • Splits and layers (Upper 1/2, Lower 1)
  • Powerful bass-reflex stereo speaker system with surround effect
  • Two 13cm by 6cm speakers, 2.5W per channel
  • Strap pins for playing anywhere
  • Class-compliant USB-MIDI connects to the free Casio Music Space iOS/Android app
  • Optional 6xAA battery power (AC adapter and music rest included)
  • 10 pounds (4.7kg)
  • $379.99 USD (street)

Available now!

Casio CT-S500 portable keyboard [Casio]

Quick reaction

Watching the Casio release video stream, the artist demonstrations are exciting. At these price points, Casio are going to sell a ton of these. I am so glad they included the “Advanced Tones”, that is, all the pianos, vintage keys and other instruments which created so much interest in the CT-S1. Hope they slash street prices on the CT-X series because the new S-series models blow them away.

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

Akai MPK mini play mk3

Even though Winter NAMM 2022 is postponed (or just outright moved) to June, a few manufacturers are sticking to their release schedule.

Include Akai on the list of schedule keepers.

Akai have revamped the MPK mini play giving it a new front panel layout and a better speaker. The mini-keyboard has been upgraded to Gen-2, too. The new MPK mini play mk3 is slightly larger: 317 x 178 x 58mm versus 312 x 172 x 46mm. No strain, there.

Akai MPK mini play mk3

Other specs are largely the same. I would think the mk3 is based on the same mk1 sound engine (probably a Dream Synthesis SAM2635). The speaker is larger and is a welcome change.

I rather like the new layout. The control knobs are larger (?) with a modern appearance. Maybe, possibly, the knob placement may interfere with finger drumming? Internal (initial) control assignments are the same. Styling overall is more “noir.” No visible changes to the arpeggiator.

Thomann indicate price at 129 EURO. Thomann USA have a $124 USD price for USA customers.

If you fancied one before, now you’re spoilt with choice.

  • More than 100 internal drum and instrument sounds
  • Gen-2 keyboard with 25 velocity-sensitive mini keys
  • 8 backlit MPC pads with Note Repeat and Full Level function (x2 banks)
  • 4 controls for editing internal sounds or MIDI parameters (x2 banks)
  • built-in speaker
  • OLED Display
  • Pitch / Modulation Joystick
  • Arpeggiator
  • Connection for sustain pedal: 1/4inch jack
  • USB-B Port
  • Headphone output: 3.5mm jack
  • Dimensions (W x D x H): 317W x 178D x 58H mm
  • Weight: 860 g (1.9 pounds)
  • Software package: Akai Pro MPC Beats, AIR Music Tech Hybrid 3, Mini Grand, Velvet and Melodics learning software with 60 lessons

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

Recent Casio patents (AiR/AiX)

Update: Here is the latest information about the CT-S500 and CT-S1000 from Casio.

After visiting the U.S. Patent and Trademark site, I normally do a deep dive into a few patents. Given the upcoming announcement of Casio’s new keyboards (Casio CT-S1000V and CT-S500), time is of the essence. Thus, here is a short list of the most relevant recent Casio patents:

11,094,307    8/17/2021  Sound generation 
10,937,404 3/ 2/2021 Sound generation, three contact switches
10,909,958 2/ 2/2021 Chord accompaniment
10,825,438 11/ 3/2020 Vocoder
10,825,434* 11/ 3/2020 Voice synthesis
10,825,433* 11/ 3/2020 Voice synthesis (MIDI)
10,810,981* 10/20/2020 Voice synthesis
10,803,844 10/13/2020 Picture/image generation in sync with music
10,789,922* 9/29/2020 Voice synthesis
10,629,179 4/21/2020 Voice synthesis
10,616,688 4/ 7/2020 Speaker box
10,559,290 2/11/2020 Waveform transfer
10,515,618* 12/24/2019 Waveform compression
10,490,172* 11/26/2019 Enlivement data (expression)
10,475,425* 11/12/2019 Waveform play-back and sound generation
10,474,387* 11/12/2019 Waveform transfer (ring buffering)

If you’re short on time, you might want to start with the starred (“*”) patents. Clearly, Casio have invested heavily in voice and instrument synthesis!

Of course, the usual caveats about patents and patent applications holds. Just because a company stakes out its intellectural property (IP) turf with a patent, does not mean they will build the technology into a finished product. Beware when drawing inferences!

A little background and context are needed. Please keep these points in mind when reading the Casio patents.

Casio have moved to a new generation of synthesis:

  • Acoustic and intelligent Resonator (AiR) sound source.
    • Multi-dimensional Morphing (changing volume and tone characteristics with variations in touch and passage of time).
    • Lossless audio compression.
    • Resonance system (string resonance, open string resonance, damper resonance, Aliquot resonance).
  • Acoustic and intelligent Xpression (AiX) sound source.
    • High performance DSP effects and EQ.
    • Higher waveform memory capacity (more waveforms, longer waveforms).
    • Amplifier and vintage effect modeling.

AiX evolved from AiR. AiR first appeared in Casio digital pianos. AiX first appeared in the CT-X series of portable keyboards. Both technologies are based on a new, proprietary, large scale integrated (LSI) processor. The Casio CT-S series, including the new models, exploits AiX technology.

Casio CT-S1 printed circuit board [Casio]

Casio have always relied upon a very high degree of functional integration. Previously, a wide range of products were based on the custom uPD800468P-012 processor. This processor was a sizable beast with 180 pins integrating major functions like digital-to-analog (DAC) and analog-to-digital conversion (ADC). The main clock ran at 48MHz. This may seem slow to people accustomed to personal computer technology, but the low clock speed is power efficient — small power supplies and/or battery operation and no fans or heat sinks. You don’t really want to lug around a PC power supply and all of its cooling elements, do you?

The uPD800468P-012 has been replaced by a new LSI processor with even more pins! The CT-S1 main board is positively sparse. Where did all of the other components go?

Slight digression. Casio and Yamaha are manufacturing juggernauts who slug it out in portable keyboards and digital pianos. Entry-level products are notoriously price-sensitive and both companies work hard to wring cost out of entry-level (and mid-range) products.

Casio ST-S1 speaker box [Casio]

Casio are pushing in other dimensions, not just LSI. With more waveform memory capacity, they have added “Advanced Tones” such as the new piano, clav, and organ samples in the popular CT-S1. They have also developed a horizontal bass-reflex speaker system for slim-line instruments. The system incorporates a new speaker box and elliptical speakers. Finally, Casio have developed their own low-latency Bluetooth audio and MIDI protocol.

For further information, I highly recommend the behind the scenes interview with the CT-S1 development team. Not only will you learn about the CT-S1, you’ll get a feeling for the “contact sport” of product engineering as the team try to balance conflicting design concerns.

[I hope that Casio don’t mind that I have reproduced a few of their pictures here.]

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

Casio CT-S1000V, anyone?

Update: Here is the latest information about the CT-S500 and CT-S1000 from Casio.

The forums are alive with rumors about the yet unannounced Casio CT-S1000V vocal synthesizer. Casio have posted a teaser video indicating a “January 2022” announcement date. I say “announcement” because the world-wide supply chain crisis will likely hold up deliveries.

As in the case of the rumored Yamaha PSR-EW425 (PSR-E473), enterprising souls have teased out pre-release images.

We do know that the CT-S1000V is based on Casio’s AiX synthesis technology. AiX is Casio’s latest generation of tone generation (large-scale integrated (LSI) circuitry). Their own teaser video has snippets of synthesized voice and/or vocoder. The teaser video is a flashdance by a four octave keyboard (pitch bend wheel and a few knobs.)

Casio CT-S1000V advertisement

The Guitar Center snap shows black and red models with oval-ish built-in speakers. There are two live control knobs along with the usual master volume and data wheel controls. There are five buttons below the display for navigating the menu system. The keys are squared-off, more like unweighted piano keys than synth keys. The GC text mentions portability, so I would expect battery operation as well as AC adapter.

The knob legends are different on the red model and the gray (black) model. This suggests two new models. Perhaps the red CT-S1000V has voice synthesis and the grey (CT-S500) is solely instrument synthesis?

Casio CT-S1000V panel

The second image has more detail. The assignable live control knobs to the left of the display are labeled “K1/VOCAL TYPE” and “K2/PORTAMENTO”. The vocal type sweeps between MALE and FEMALE. The tone mode select switches choose LYRICS and INSTRUMENT. There is some rhythm and record capability.

Intriguingly, the panel is is labeled “AiX sound source with vocal synthesis”. Coupled with “lyrics” and “vocalist,” one thinks of voice synthesis. Is this instrument Casio’s answer to Yamaha’s VKB-100 VOCALOID™ keyboard?

Update: Casio have posted a new teaser video. Casio will be holding an event — CasioKeynote.com — on January 20, 2022 at 1PM EST. No, that’s not too early for me on the west coast, 10AM PST. 🙂

Counting keys in the new video, there must both 49- and 61-key models. If — if — the sound in the video is produced by the CT-S1000V in one pass, then it is capable of combining (playing) voice over music/rhythm parts.

There is also a new unofficial image showing the Casio CT-S1000V back panel. It’s blurry as heck, so have at it. The rear panel layout is very similar to the CT-S400. For that matter, the front panel has a similar flavor, too.

Casio CT-S1000V back panel

At least Casio aren’t waiting for Summer NAMM (June 3-5, 2022) to announce new product!

If you’re wondering about Casio’s recent R&D, please see my short list of recent Casio patents.

Interested in Vocaloid?

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

ChordPro auto-accompaniment: Uses

The ChordPro to Yamaha auto-accompaniment program, cp2mid, translates an extended ChordPro song file to a MIDI file containing Yamaha-compatible auto-accompaniment messages. The MIDI file is compatible with recent mid- and high-end Yamaha arranger workstations like Yamaha Genos™. Once you transfer the MIDI file to the arranger, it plays like any other Standard MIDI File (SMF). Instead of directly playing notes, however, it tells the arranger’s auto-accompaniment engine what to play: the style, the tempo, the chords and the section (intro, main, fill in, or ending). The arranger displays chords and lyrics in sync with play-back.

What can you do with ChordPro auto-accompaniment? Here’s a few ideas.

Play along with a song from the Web

ChordPro is one of the most widely used song formats on the Web. Pros and punters alike use ChordPro as shorthand lead sheets. You’ve probably seen formatted ChordPro songs like:

 G      G7          C         G 
Amazing Grace! (how sweet the sound)
D
That saved a wretch like me!
G G7 C G
I once was lost, but now am found,
Em D G
Was blind, but now I see.

Presumably, a musician is already familiar with the song’s tempo and melody, needing only to follow and change chords in time.

In extended ChordPro, the chords are embedded within the lyric text:

[G]Amazing [G7] Grace! (how [C] sweet the [G] sound) 
That [G] saved a [G]wretch like [D] me! [D]
I [G] once was [G7] lost, but [C] now am [G] found,
Was [Em] blind, but [D] now I [G] see. [G]

Chords are surrounded by square brackets. Here, we assume each chord is held for a single measure. Songs on the Web are very loose (flexible!) about time. Auto-accompaniment, however, is precise. You will probably need to tighten up timing when using a song file from the Web.

You’ll also see ChordPro directives in song files:

{title: Amazing Grace }   
{key: D}
{artist: Munsoncovers}

Directives express song meta-data and control formatting. Extended ChordPro adds a few new directives for auto-accompaniment:

{title: Amazing Grace }   
{key: D}
{artist: Munsoncovers}
{time: 3/4}
{comment: SouthernGospel is stylecode 7812 3/4}
{stylecode: 7812}
{tempo: 90}
{start_accomp}

You’ll want to add the time signature, tempo, stylecode, and start_accomp directives to the song. The stylecode directive selects one of the hundreds of built-in arranger styles. (A convenient list of codes is included in the distribution.)

You can always leave out the stylecode and select the accompaniment style on the arranger keyboard itself. You can choose one of the preset styles or user styles. Thus, you can try out different arrangements or use a style of your own design.

Finally, extended ChordPro allows annotations which select an accompaniment section like an intro, main, fill-in or ending. Here is “Amazing Grace” ready to go:

{title: Amazing Grace }  
{key: D}
{artist: Munsoncovers}
{time: 3/4}
{comment: SouthernGospel is stylecode 7812 3/4}
{stylecode: 7812}
{tempo: 90}
{start_accomp}

# Introduction
[G][*IA]

# Verse
[G][*MA] Amazing [G7] Grace! (how [C] sweet the [G] sound)
That [G] saved a [G]wretch like [D] me! [D][*FA]
I [G][*MA] once was [G7] lost, but [C] now am [G] found,
Was [Em] blind, but [D] now I [G] see. [G][*FA]

# Ending
[G][*EA]

Don’t forget to turn on the Lyric or Score display. Song chords and lyrics are displayed during play-back.

Jam

Auto-accompaniment is a tireless band! Plug in some chords and play along.

Here is a fast blues shuffle. Copy and paste the 12-bar sections as many times as you like. Change the accompaniment sections to build up energy as the tune progresses.

{title: Shuffle Blues}   
{key: C}
{time: 4/4}
# Style: BluesShuffle (3685)
{stylecode: 3685}
{tempo: 120}

{start_accomp}
[C][*IA]

{start_of_instrumental}
[C][*MA] [C] [C] [C7][*FA]
[F][*MA] [F7] [C] [C7][*FA]
[G7][*MA] [F] [C] [G7][*FC]
{end_of_instrumental}

{start_of_instrumental}
[C][*MB] [C] [C] [C7][*FB]
[F][*MB] [F7] [C] [C7][*FB]
[G7][*MB] [F] [C] [G7][*FC]
{end_of_instrumental}

[C7][*EA]

Experiment with different intros: [*IA], [*IB] or [*IC]. Try different endings: [*EA], [*EB] or [*EC]. An intro or ending will follow the preceding chord as if you played it on the keyboard itself. Generally, the A variations are one measure long. Length of the B and C variations depend on the chosen style. You will need to specify the root chord for each measure in order to keep play-back in sync.

Write a song of your own

Why not write a song of your own? Yamaha’s built-in Chord Step Edit is too detailed and clunky for songwriting. Use cp2mid instead.

{title: Minor Blues}   
{key: Cm}
{time: 4/4}
# Style: SlowBlues (7810)
{stylecode: 7810}
{tempo: 90}

{start_accomp}
[Cm7][*IA]

[Cm7][*MA] My baby left me. [Cm7] [Cm7] Now I'm all alone. [Cm7][*FA]
[Fm7][*MA] My baby left me. [Fm7] [Cm7] And I'm all alone. [Cm7][*FA]
[Ab7][*MA] I still love her, [G7] [Cm7] Won't answer the phone. [Cm7][*FC]

[Cm7][*MB] It's about money, [Cm7] [Cm7] I know it's true. [Cm7][*FB]
[Fm7][*MB] It's about money, [Fm7] [Cm7] I know it's true. [Cm7][*FB]
[Ab7b5][*MB] Can't keep a job, [G7] [Cm7] I am so blue. [Cm7][*FC]

[Cm7][*EA]

It’s easy to change the chord progressions and song structure. Plus, the lyrics are all in front of you. Once the song is loaded, you have the freedom to change the tempo and style on the keyboard. Unlike Chord Step Edit, you can manually choose a user style; you aren’t limited to the preset styles.

Turn on Lyric or Score display. You’ll be able to sing and play along with your new song!

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski

ChordPro auto-accompaniment: Implementation notes

I’m prep’ing my ChordPro to Yamaha accompaniment program (cp2mid) for distribution. Please check out the demo. In the meantime, here are a few comments about the implementation.

Command line interface

cp2mid doesn’t have a fancy graphical user interface (GUI). A GUI is too much for a simple tool that translates an extended ChordPro file into a Standard MIDI File (Type 0).

I’m distributing both Java source code and a JAR file. The JAR file contains the compiled Java — the Java executable, if you will. “JAR” is an acronym for “Java Archive” and is produced by the Java archive program (jar), which is part of the Java development environment (JDK). JAR is a way to package up a compiled Java program, hiding all of the interior classes, etc. An end user doesn’t really need to know about JAR.

Given the JAR file, enter the following command line to run cp2mid:

    java -jar cp2mid.jar AFile.cho

“AFile.cho” is the name of an extended ChordPro file to be translated. You can hide the cp2mid.jar file within a Windows BAT file or shell file. Here is cp2mid.bat:

    java -jar cp2mid.jar %1

Nothing complicated, here.

cp2mid recognizes the “.cho” file name extension. It does not recognize any other extensions. If you snag a ChordPro file from the Web, you may need to change its extension to “.cho”. cp2mid replaces “.cho” with “.mid” in order to make the MIDI file name. Thus, “AFile.cho” is translated to “AFile.mid”.

During development and testing, you can run cp2mid starting with the compiled classes, e.g., cp2mid.class. Enter the command line:

    java cp2mid AFile.cho

to run cp2mid. The Java interpreter will look for “cp2mid.class” and the rest of the compiled classes needed by cp2mid. These compiled classes must be available in the same directory as cp2mid.class. “cp2mid”, by the way, is the main class in the application. You’ll need to specify the main class when creating a JAR file. Again, these steps are relevant only to developers.

Java classes

cp2mid has five Java classes:

  • cp2mid (cp2mid.java) Main class and driver
  • SongElement (SongElement.java) Basic element (parts) of a Song
  • Song (Song.java) Represents a ChordPro song in terms of SongElements
  • Song2mid (Song2mid.java) Translates the internal song representation to MIDI
  • MidiFile (MidiFile.java) Represents and manipulates a standard MIDI File (SMF)

The MidiFile class was used in an earlier prototype and still contains a bit of unused legacy code. This may change in future versions. The MidiFile class exploits the standard Java MIDI packages and classes. It creates a MIDI file and inserts MIDI messages (meta, SysEx and otherwise) into a MIDI file.

cp2mid is the boss. It calls on the other classes to do their jobs. Processing is broken into five phases:

  1. Check and manipulate file names.
  2. Read the ChordPro file into a String array, one line per array element.
  3. Translate each line into one or more SongElements.
  4. Translate the SongElements into MIDI.
  5. Write the internal MIDI representation to a Type 0 SMF.

The translation phases do the heavy lifting.

Song and song elements

A Song is a list of SongElements. A SongElement represents one of several ChordPro song constituents:

  • Directive
  • Chord
  • Lyric
  • Line
  • Annotation
  • Comment
  • Tab

All SongElements have the same data members. Each SongElement has a tag which identifies its type. The type determines the validity and interpretation of the other data members.

The Song class translates extended ChordPro to a list of SongElements. This is, effectively, the intermediate, internal representation of a ChordPro song.

ChordPro directives begin with ‘{‘ and end with ‘}’. Usually ChordPro directives control song formating. Extended ChordPro uses key, tempo, time signature, style code, start accompaniment and stop accompaniment directives to issue MIDI messages that will control the accompaniment engine when the MIDI file is played back.

ChordPro chords and lyrics are what it’s all about. Chords begin with ‘[‘ and end with ‘]’. Chords are extended by an optional beat count which specifies how long the chord is held. A lyric is text and may be multiple syllables long (i.e., anything up to the next chord, annotation, or end of line.)

A line element is a marker for important end-of-lines. Line elements affect lyric formating.

Normally, a ChordPro annotation is text added to a song when it is displayed. Annotations begin with ‘*[‘ and end with ‘]’. Certain predefined annotations, e.g., [*MA], [*FA], etc. change the accompaniment section during play-back.

Comments are just that. cp2mid saves the text, but doesn’t do anything with it.

A ChordPro song may contain guitar tablature (tab). Right now, cp2mid ignores tablature. This has not been tested. I’m not sure how to handle or translate tablature as yet.

Song to MIDI

The Song2mid class translates the internal intermediate song representation to MIDI messages and adds the MIDI messages to a MIDI sequence. The MidiFile class helper functions create specific types of messages. Base MIDI message and sequence classes belong to the standard Java MIDI package.

The Song2mid class walks the SongElement list from front to back. Based on element type, it dispatches to an element type-specific handler. The handler adds one or more MIDI messages to the sequence.

A separate blog post describes the MIDI messages.

I tried to encapsulate most of the “Yamaha-ness” in the Song2mid and MidiFile classes. ChordPro is very loose and forgiving when it comes to chord syntax. Song2mid recognizes only the 33 or so Yamaha chord types as defined in the Genos Data List PDF. If Song2mid doesn’t recognize a chord, it issues either a major or minor triad.

Example songs

I will distribute 15 example songs in extended ChordPro and MIDI format. Even if you don’t run cp2mid (or look at its implementation), please take a look at the extended ChordPro songs and try the MIDI files on your arranger. All sorts of fun and crazy things happen in real music (key changes, time signature changes, anticipation) and the examples demonstrate how to handle many exceptional situations. I chose certain songs as examples for testing because they are weird. 🙂

I tested the MIDI files on Genos and I’m curious about their behavior on other arranger keyboards. The MIDI files are similar to those generated by Yamaha ChordTracker. If your arranger plays ChordTracker MIDI files, it should play cp2mid MIDI files.

I don’t want to lead you on — it takes a fair bit of effort to take an Internet ChordPro file and whip it into shape. ChordPro as a formating tool is very lenient and forgiving. Accompaniment requires tighter semantics and precision like most “executable” computer stuff. It’s fun to whip a song into shape, but it requires work.

Copyright © 2022 Paul J. Drongowski